Understanding health care in the 2012 election.

نویسندگان

  • Robert J Blendon
  • John M Benson
  • Amanda Brulé
چکیده

The outcome of the 2012 election will have far­ reaching ramifications for the future of U.S. health care. Rarely in a national election have the two major candidates’ views about health care been so diametrically opposed. The views of President Barack Obama and Republican presi­ dential nominee Mitt Romney differ on whether the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) should be implemented or repealed, whether Medicare and Medicaid should remain in their current forms with their current level of commitments, and whether the availability of abortion services should be further restricted. In addition, the can­ didates differ on whether the historically high federal budget deficit1 should be addressed with spending cuts alone or whether the solution should include some tax increases and whether more of the spending cuts should come from defense or from the domestic arena. This last decision will probably affect the level of future federal health care spending in areas such as the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and community health centers, among others. Here, we examine the role of health care in the 2012 election by drawing on the results of 37 independent telephone polls (with both land­ line and cell­phone respondents) in a project supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Founda­ tion. Examination of these polls as a group pro­ vides insight into the evolution of the public’s thinking. Our analysis focuses on public percep­ tions of the current political environment sur­ rounding health care, the role of health care as a voting issue, and the importance of specific health policy issues to individual voters’ choices. Polls show that health care is the second most important issue for likely voters in deciding their 2012 presidential vote (CBS–NYT, September 2012; HSPH–SSRS, 2012; see box for polls). This is the highest that health care has been ranked as a presidential election issue since 1992 (CNN–NEP, 2008).2 When likely voters were asked to choose from a list of issues, an approach similar to that used in election­day exit polls, one in five (20%) named “health care and Medicare” as the most important issue in their 2012 voting choice, far behind “the economy and jobs” (cited by 51%) (HSPH–SSRS, 2012) (Table 1). One factor that influences election outcomes for incumbent presidents is the public’s assess­ ment of their record — in this case, the Presi­

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Role of Internet in Elections (A case study of the Presidential Election of the USA in 2008)

Internet has found an increasing role in the politics, during the last decade. Today, terms like digital democracy, Internet elections, Internet advertisements (propaganda, social- political Web logging in the internet has become common terms.  Internet is getting replaced for the traditional media in politics. The interactive characteristic of this media has changed it to an unrivaled instrume...

متن کامل

Morality and Values in Support of Universal Healthcare Must be Enshrined in Law; Comment on “Morality and Markets in the NHS”

This is a commentary on Gilbert and colleagues’ (1) paper on morality and markets in the National Health Service (NHS). Morality and values are not ephemeral qualities and universal healthcare is not simply an aspiration; it has to be enshrined in law. The creation of the UK NHS in 1948 was underpinned by core legal duties which required a system of public funding and delivery to follow. The mo...

متن کامل

Leading change during health care transformation.

The time is now. Over the past decade, health care providers have heard about the unprecedented redesign of the health care system. With the presidential election fast approaching, waves of uncertainty are swirling around the Affordable Care Act. No matter the outcomes of the November elections and their impact to the health care reform bill, there are sustainable aspects that will continue to ...

متن کامل

تاثیر چرخه‌های انتخاباتی بر رشد هزینه‌های بهداشت عمومی کشورهای منتخب درحال توسعه و توسعه‌یافته (2010-1994)

  Parties and candidates in the election campaign try to raise the community to vote for them by offering a variety of social policies. However, the public health expenditures have been raised among the candidates as one of the most important tools to attract votes. Thus, this study uses panel data to investigate whether the components of electoral cycle have affected the growth of public healt...

متن کامل

The Effects of Salient Roll Call Votes in the 2010 Election

We investigate the relationship between controversial roll call votes and support for Democratic incumbents in the 2010 midterm elections. Consistent with previous analyses, we find that supporters of health care reform paid a significant price at the polls. We go beyond these analyses by identifying a mechanism for this apparent effect: constituents perceived incumbents who supported health ca...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The New England journal of medicine

دوره 367 17  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012